Hwang Ui-jo’s ‘Bilateral Representative’ Controversy… “There was no assistance for his brother-in-law”

Hwang’s legal representative, Daehwan, a law firm, said on the 15th, “There is a fact that he has submitted the appointment of (Hwang) to the investigative agency, but it is clear that he has not provided any kind of assistance for the sentence.”

Daehwan explained, “An existing lawyer appointed by his brother-in-law was asked to be present temporarily when it became impossible to participate in the investigation due to the schedule.”

Dae-hwan said he fully explained the situation to investigative agencies and the Korean Bar Association in advance and asked for advice. He later said he did not participate in the investigation after receiving a reply from the Bar Association that there could be a conflict of interest.

According to Daehwan, there are two cases in which Hwang is currently involved: Hwang’s complaint as a victim of sexual intercourse dissemination and Hwang’s investigation as a suspect in illegal filming.

Daehwan says he has not been in charge of the case that Hwang sued as a victim, and has only defended Hwang’s alleged illegal filming since last month.

Daehwan said, “Hwang and his family requested a temporary investigation into his brother-in-law and submitted a senior system to the prosecution on the 23rd of last month,” but explained, “He did not participate in the prosecution’s investigation after internal review such as conflict of interest issues.” 바카라

“I am sorry for the disappointment that Hwang has caused to all of you who have supported me so far,” he said, adding, “I will actively cooperate with the investigation agency.”

Earlier, it became controversial when it was revealed that Hwang and Hwang’s brother-in-law had appointed the same law firm. This is because the Lawyers Act prohibits bilateral representation to defend both sides at the same time in one case. When the relevant point came out, he submitted a resignation letter to the court on the 13th.

Hwang’s brother-in-law was indicted in June on charges of claiming to be Hwang’s ex-lover and sharing photos and sex videos of Hwang and other women on social media, or claiming that Hwang had a relationship with a number of women and harmed them.